keywords: Functional properties, maize flour, fermentation, LAB-consortium
The dynamics of functional properties of maize fermented with lactic acid (LAB) consortium from cereals were evaluated. Maize was processed into flour and fermented with LAB-consortium isolated from maize and sorghum in the following combination Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 + Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, ATCC 53/03 + Lactobacillus nantensis LP33 + Lactobacillus fermentum CIP 102980 + Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016, and Pediococcus acidilactici DSM 20284 + Lactobacillus fermentum CIP 102980 + Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869 + Lactobacillus nantensis LP33 + Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 respectively and then naturally to determine their effect on the functional properties of maize. The result showed a gradual decrease in bulk density with increasing fermentation period from 0.82 ± 0.02 g/mL to 0.80 ± 0.03 g/mL (natural fermentation), from 0.82 ± 0.02 g/mL to 0.79 ± 0.03 g/mL (LAB-consortium from maize fermentation) and from 0.82 ± 0.02 g/mL to 0.78 ± 0.03 g/mL (LAB-consortium from sorghum fermentation). The swelling capacity decreased from 0.31 ± 0.03% (0 h) to 0.20 ± 0.03% (48 h), from 0.31 ± 0.03% (0 h) to 0.18 ± 0.02% and from 0.31 ± 0.03% to 0.19 ± 0.01% in natural, LAB-consortium from maize and LAB-consortium from sorghum fermentation respectively. Water holding capacity decreased from 1.5 ± 0.03 mL/g to 0.2 ± 0.03 mL/g (naturally fermentation), from 1.5 ± 0.03 mL/g to 0.4 ± 0.02 mL/g and from 1.5 ± 0.03 mL/g to 1.0 ± 0.03 mL/g in LAB-consortium from maize and LAB-consortium from sorghum fermentation respectively. Oil holding capacity (OHC) increased significantly (p<0.05) with increase in the fermentation periods from 8.00 ± 0.03 mL/g to 9.50 ± 0.02 mL/g (natural fermentation), 8.00 ± 0.03 mL/g to 9.80 ± 0.03 mL/g (LAB-consortium from maize fermentation) and from 8.00 ± 0.03 mL/g to 9.73 ± 0.03 mL/g (LAB-consortium from sorghum fermentation). The least gelation concentration ranged from 3.0% in the unfermented sample to 6.0% in the various fermentation products. The variations differ significantly (p<0.05) with the unfermented sample. Emulsion capacity (EC) of the maize flour sample increased with increasing fermentation period from 41.03 ± 2.48% to 59.02 ± 2.44% (naturally fermentation), from 41.03 ± 2.48% to 62.12 ± 3.10% and from 41.03 ± 2.48% to 61.34 ± 2.10% in LAB-consortium from maize and LAB-consortium from sorghum fermentation respectively. This suggests the potentials of LAB-consortia fermentation in improving nutritional and functional properties of maize flour.
Acuña SPC, González JHG & Torres IDR 2012. Physicochemical characteristics and functional properties of vitabosa (mucuna deeringiana) and soybean (glycine max) Características físico-químicas e propriedades funcionais de vitabosa(Mucuna deeringiana) e soja (Glycine max). Ciênce and Tecnol. Aliment., Campinas, 32(1): 98-105. Adebowale OJ & Maliki K 2011. Effect of Fermentation Period on The Chemical Composition and Functional Properties of Pigeon Peas (Cajanus cajan) Seed Flour. Inter. Food Res. J., 18(4): 1329-1333. Aremu MO, Olaofe O, Akintayo ET & Adeyeye EI 2008. Foaming, Water Absorption, Emulsification and Gelation Properties of Kersting’s Groundnut (Kerstingiella geocarpa) and Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranean) Flours as Influenced by Neutral Salts and Their Concentrations. Pak. J. Nutr., 7 (1): 194-201. Aremu MO & Ibrahim H 2014. Mineral Content of Some Plant Foods Grown in Nigeria: A Review. Food Sci. Qual. Man., 29: 73-81. Beugre GAM, Yapo BM, Blei SH & Gnakri D 2014. Effect of Fermentation Time on the Physico-Chemical Properties of Maize Flour. Inter. J. Res. Stud. Biosci., 2(8): 30-38. Chau CF & Huang YL 2003. Comparison of the chemical composition and physicochemical properties of different fibers prepared from the peel of Citrus sinensis L. cv. Liucheng. J. Agricult. Food Chem., 51: 2615–2618. Chelule PK, Mbongwa HP, Carries S & Gqaleni N 2010. Lactic acid fermentation improves the quality of amahewu, a traditional South African maize-based porridge. Food Chem., 122: 656–661. CWFS, 2013. High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE). 2013. Biofuels and food security. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on food security and nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome. http://www.fao.org/ Accessed December 10, 2015. Dajanta K, Chukeatirote E, Apichartsrangkoon A & Frazier RA 2009. Enhanced Glycine production of fermented soybean products by Bacillus species. Acta Biologica Szegediensis., 53 (2): 93-98. Desikachar HSR 1980. Development of weaning food with high calories density and low hot paste viscosity using traditional technologies. Food Nutr. Bull., 2: 21-23. Elkhalifa AEO, Schiffler B & Bernhardt R 2005. Effect of fermentation on the functional properties of sorghum flour. Food Chem., 92: 1-5. Gernah DI, Ariahu CC & Ingbian EK 2011. Effects of malting and lactic fermentation on some chemical and functional properties of maize (Zea mays). Am. J. Food Technol., 6: 404-412. Gwirtz JA & Garcia-Casal MN 2014. Processing maize flour and corn meal food products. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 1312: 66-75. Huili P, Guangyong Q, Zhongfang T, Zongwei L, Yanping W & Yimin C 2011. Natural populations of lactic acid bacteria associated with silage fermentation as determined by phenotype, 16S ribosomal RNA and recA gene analysis. System. & Appl. Microbiol., 34(3): 235-241. Kaushal P, Kumar V, Sharma HK 2012. Comparative study of physico-chemical, functional, anti-nutritional and pasting properties of taro (Colocasia esculenta), rice (Oryza sativa), pegion pea (Cajanus cajan) flour and their blends. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 48: 59-68. Maidala A, Doma UD & Egbo LM 2013. Effects of Different Processing Methods on the Chemical Composition and Antinutritional Factors of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Pak. J. Nutr., 12(12): 1057-1060. Masood MI, Qadir MI, Shirazi JH & Khan IU 2011. Beneficial effects of lactic acid bacteria on human beings. Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 37(1): 91–98. Ocheme OB, Adedeji OE, Lawal G & Zakari UM 2015. Effect of Germination on Functional Properties and Degree of Starch Gelatinization of Sorghum Flour. J. Food Res., 4(2): 159-165. Ojokoh A & Bello B 2014. Effect of Fermentation on Nutrient and Anti-nutrient Composition of Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and Soyabean (Glycine max) Blend Flours. J. Life Sci., 8(8): 668-675. Olanipekun BF, Otunola ET & Oyelade OJ 2015. Effect of Fermentation on Antinutritional Factors and in Vitro Protein Digestibility of Bambara Nut (Voandzeia subterranean L.). Food Sci. Qual. Man., 39: 98-112. Onyango CA, Ochanda SO, Mwasaru MA, Ochieng JK, Mathooko FM & Kinyuru JN 2013. Effects of Malting and Fermentation on Anti-Nutrient Reduction and Protein Digestibility of Red Sorghum, White Sorghum and Pearl Millet. J. Food Res., 2 (1): 41-49. Ranum P, Pe˜na-Rosas JP & Garcia-Casal MN 2014. Global maize production, utilization, and consumption. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 1312: 105–112. Robertson GL, Monredon FD, Dysseler P, Guillon F, Amado R & Thibault JF 2000. Hydration properties of dietary fibre and resistant starch: a European collaborative study. Lebensm. Wiss. –Technol., 33: 72–79. Sanni AI & Adesulu AT 2013. Microbiological and physico-chemical changes during fermentation of maize for masa production. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 7(34): 4355-4362. Singh A, Yadav N & Sharma S 2012. Effect of fermentation on physicochemical properties & in vitro starch and protein digestibility of selected cereals. Int. J. Agric. Food Sci., 2(3): 66-70. Suresh C & Samsher C 2013. Assessment of functional properties of different flours. Afr. J. Agri. Res., 8(38): 4849-4852. Wilhelm LR, Dwayna AS & Gerand HB 2004. Introduction to problem solving skills, In: Food and process engineering technology. ASAE. p.76.