(A Peer Review Journal)
e–ISSN: 2408–5162; p–ISSN: 2048–5170


Pages: 188-194
A. A. Owojori, I. M. K. Gadzama and G. J. Sow

keywords: Acoustics, noise pollution, outdoor noise, school, traffic noise, Zaria


Noise is considered as an environmental pollutant to which man is subjected to throughout his life. It has been reported to cause cardiovascular diseases, annoyance, aggression, impairment of cognitive performances and productivity. This study therefore investigated the impacts of traffic noise on the outdoor noise in an academic environment. The outdoor and traffic noise were quantified using a sound level meter. The collected data were used to evaluate noise parameters such as noise pollution level (LNP), equivalent continuous noise level (Leq.), traffic noise index (TNI), and Noise climate (NC). The traffic volumes around the schools were also evaluated which indicated high frequencies of road users particularly motorcycles. The outdoor noise levels ranged between 75.7-98.5dBA which exceeded the WHO standard of 55dBA and the traffic noise indices for the schools ranged between 56.2-122.7dBA. The Traffic Noise Indices were positively correlated (r=0.279) with the outdoor noise levels. The planting of trees around the schools and installation of noise barriers should be encouraged to reduce the high outdoor noise levels.


Alsubaie ASR 2014. Indoor noise pollution in elementary schools of eastern province, Saudi Arabia. J. of Res. in Env. Sci. &Tox., 3(2): 25-29. American Academy of Pediatrics 1993. Committee on school health. School health: Policy & Practice, 5thedn. 87-92. Available Online: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cont. Accessed on November 22nd, 2015. Amin N, Skider I, Zafor NA & Chowdhury MAI 2014. Assessment of noise pollution of two vulnerable sites of Sylhet city, Bangladesh. Int. J. Wat. Res.&Env. Eng., 6(1): 112-120. Ana GREE, Shendell DG, Brown GE & Sridhar MKC 2009. Assessment of noise & associated health impacts at selected secondary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Env.& Publ. Hlth., 1-6. Ayaz SB & Rahman MM 2011. Assessment of roadway noise & potential mitigation measures. Dhaka Uni. Eng. & Tech., 1(2): 43-48. Belojevic G, Jakovljevic B, Stojanov V, Paunovic K & llic J 2008b. Urban road-traffic noise and blood pressure & heart rate in preschool children. Env. Int., 34: 226-231. Belojevic G, Jakovljevic B, Stojanov VJ, Slepcevic VZ & Paunovic K 2008a. Nighttime road-traffic noise and arterial hypertension in an urban population. Hyp. Res., 31: 775-781. Flexer C & Long S 2003. Sound-field amplification: Preliminary information regarding special education referrals. Comm. Dis. Qtrly., 25(1): 29-34. Goswani S, Nayak SK, Pradihan AC & Dey SK 2011. A study on traffic noise of two campuses of university, Balasore, India. J. of Env. Bio., 32(1): 105-109. Hagen M, Huber L & Kahlert J 2002. Acoustic school design. Forum Acusticum Sevilla, pp. 1-7. Haq I, Hussain T, Farooq H & Ahmad MR 2014. Evaluation of the traffic noise pollution at some busiest sites of Faisalabad city, Pakistan. Aca. Res. Int., 5: 23-26. Kamal M, Abdallah El-Rahman R, & Tawfiq S 2010. Evaluation of noise levels affecting schools in Cairo – Egypt. Proc. of ISMA2010 including USD2010, 20–22 Sep 2010. Leuven, Belgium, pp. 1811–1820. Marathe PD 2012. Traffic noise pollution. IJED., 9(1): 63-68. Ozer S, Zengin M & Yilmaz H 2014. Determination of the noise pollution on university (Education) campuses: A case study of Ataturk University, Ekoloji,23(90): 49-54. Paunovic K, Belojevic G & Jakovljevic B 2013. Blood pressure of urban school children in relation to road-traffic noise, traffic density and presence of public transport. Noise & Health, 15(65): 253-260. Paunovic K, Belojevic G, Jakovljevic B, Stojanov V & Llic ZJ 2009. The effects of road-traffic noise on blood pressure of children aged 7-11 years in Belgrade. In: Abstracts from Euronoise 2009, 8th European conference on noise control, Edinburgh, Scotland, Oct. 26-28, 2009. ActaAcus. Acus., 95: 47-48. Pritam U, Pandey G & Singh SP 2014. Assessment of outdoor & indoor noise pollution in commercial areas of Gorakhpur city. Int. J. Eng. Res. & Tech., 312: 777-783. Ralte L & Lalramnghinglova H 2013. Assessment on different levels of noise pollution in Aizawl city, Mizoram, India. Sci. V., 13: 157-161. Silva LT, Oliveira IS & Silva JF 2016. The impact of urban noise on primary schools. Perceptive evaluation & objective assessment. Appl. Ac., 106: 2-9. Singh N & Davar SC 2004. Noise pollution: sources, effects, & control. J. Hum. Eco., 16(3): 181-187. Stansfeld SA & Matheson MP 2003. Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. Bri. Med. B., 68: 243-257. WHO 2004. The physical school environment, an essential component of a health-promoting school, (WHO/PHE and WHO/NPH). Available Online: www.who.int/school_youth_health/med... (Accessed on March 3rd, 2016). WHO 2014. School & youth health. What is a health promoting school? Available Online: http://www.google.com.ng/search?q=WHO.%20(2014).%20School%20and%20Youth%20Health.%20What%20is%20a%20Health%20promoting%20school&clientAction=534.click&clientAction=534.click&client=ISO-8859-1&hl=en (Accessed on 5th December, 2015). World Health Organization 1987. The ottawa charter for health promotion. Health promotion international. Accessed from http://www.who.int/../en/ on July 08, 2016.