(A Peer Review Journal)
e–ISSN: 2408–5162; p–ISSN: 2048–5170


Pages: 261-266
C. C. Onoyima, F. G. Okibe, I. B. Anweting and J. N. Akoji

keywords: Drug loading, doxorubicin, methotrexate, composite, hydroxyapatite, sodium alginate


Drug delivery systems alter the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the drug by modifying the rate at which the drug is being released into the system. Its success depends on the drug loading method employed. Four different methods (methods 1, 2, 3 and 4) of loading doxorubicin (DOX) and methotrexate (MTX) on hydroxyapatite-sodium alginate composite were investigated in this study. Doxorubicin was loaded well (above 80%) by all the four loading methods studied, while for methotrexate method 2 and 4 were better (39.98% and 37.10%, respectively) than method 1 and 3 (10.39% and 15.21%, respectively). Release study for doxorubicin, indicated that adsorption method (method 1) had faster release rate than other methods, and followed first order release rate with Fickian diffusion as the predominant release mechanism; while methods 2, 3 and 4 also followed first order release rate, but with a mixture of diffusion and degradation as the release mechanism. For methotrexate, only method 4 sustained the release of the drug for about 9 h, while other methods had high burst release effects, which provides insufficient release data for further kinetic study. These observations show that the success of a delivery system depends on the loading method.


Alimardan Z, Darabi M &Natori R 2014. Drug delivery of indomethacin in use nature starch based nanocomposite hydrogel in vitro. Int. J. Biosci., 5(11): 51-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.11.51-56. Bach LG,Islam MR,Mai TB, Nga TT,Niranjanmurthi L &Lim KT2012. Synthesis, characterization, and protein immobilization study of phema grafted hydroxyapatite nanocrystals via surface initiated radical polymerization. Paper Presented at the 15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, Italy, 24-28 June, 2012. Bennet D &Kim S 2014. Polymer nanoparticles for smart drug delivery. InTech, 257 - 310 http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/58422 Chahatray R, Sahoo D, Mohanty DP &Nayak PL 2013. Guargum-Sodium Alginate Blended with Cloisite 30B for Controlled Release of Anticancer Drug Curcumin. World J. Nano Sci.& Techn., 2(1): 26-32. Chandrasekar A, Sagadevan S &Dakshnamoorthy A 2013. Synthesis and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HAP) using the wet chemical technique. J. Physical Sci., 8(32): 1639 – 1645. Chime SA, Onunkwo GC &Onyishi I 2013. Kinetics and mechanisms of drug release from swellable and non swellable matrices: A review. Res. J. Pharmac., Bio.&Chem. Sci., 4(2): 97 – 103. Costa P &Sousa-Lobo JM 2001. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur. J. Pharmac. Sci., 13: 123–133. Das PR, Nanda RM, Behara A &Nayak PL 2011. Gelatin blended with nanoparticles cloisite30B (MMT) for control drug delivery of anticancer drug paclitaxel. Int. Res. J. Biochem.&Bioinformatics, 1(2): 035-042. Dash S, Murthy PN, Nath L &Chowdhury P 2010. Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems. Acta Poloniae Pharmac. – Drug Res., 67(3): 217 – 223. Higuchi T1961. Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. J. Pharmac. Sci., 50: 847-875. Hua S, Yang H &Wang A 2010. A pH-sensitive nanocomposite microsphere based on chitosan and montmorillonite with in vitro reduction of the burst release effect. Drug Devt.&Indu. Pharmacy, 36(9): 1106–1114. Huang X&Brazel CS 2001. On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. J. Controlled Release, 73: 121–136. Iliescu RI, Andronescu E, Ghiţulică DC, Berger D &Ficai A 2011. Montmorillonite-alginate nanocomposite beads as drug carrier for oral administration of carboplatin – preparation and characterization. U.P.B Sci. Bull. Series B, 73(3): 3 – 16. Iliescu RI, Andronescua E, Ghitulicaa CD, Voicua G, Ficai A &Hoteteu M 2014. Montmorillonite–alginate nanocomposite as a drug delivery system – incorporation and in vitro release of irinotecan. Int. J. Pharmac., 463: 184– 192. Javid A, Ahmadian S, Saboury AA, Kalantarc SM &Rezaei-Zarchid S 2014. Novel biodegradable heparin-coated nanocomposite system for targeted drug delivery. Royal Soc. Chem. Advan., 4: 13719 – 13728. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T &Yamamuro T1990. Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J. Biomed. Materials Res., 24:721–734. Liu T, Chen S, Li J &Liu D 2006. Study on drug release behaviour of CDHA/chitosan nanocomposites: Effect of CDHA nanoparticles. J. Controlled Release, 112: 88–95. Malesu VK, Sahoo D &Nayak PL 2011. chitosan–sodium alginate nanocomposites blended with cloisite 30b as a novel drug delivery system for anticancer drug curcumin.Int. J. Appl. Bio.& Pharmac. Techn., 2(3): 402 – 411. Marques C, Ferreira JM, Andhenronescu E, Ficai D, Sonmez M &Ficai A2014. Multifunctional Material for bone cancer treatment.International Journal of Nanomedicine, 9, 2713 – 2725. Mohanty DP, Biswal SK &Nayak L2015. Preparation of starch-chitosan nanocomposites for control drug release of curcumin. Int. J. Current Engr.&Techn., 5(1): 336 – 343. Mora-Huertasa CE, Fessi H &Elaissari A 2010. Polymer-based nanocapsules for drug delivery. Int. J. Pharmac., 385: 113 – 142. Papadimitriou S, Bikiaris D, Avgoustakis K, Karavas E &Georgarakis M2008. Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with dorzolamide and pramipexole. Carbohydrate Polymers, 73: 44–54. Parida UK, Nayak AK, Binhani BK &Nayak PL 2011. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol blended with cloisite 30B for controlled release of the anticancer drug curcumin. J. Biomate &Nanobiotech., 2: 414-425.